Lm4562 vs opa2604

Lm4562 vs opa2604. com 6 Specifications 6. I find OPA2604 more laid back/smoother and LM4562 very crisp/more forward. OPA2604 is the most "coloured" sounding (in the nicest possible way) and the LM4562 probably the more clinical. Then National Semi, for marketing reasons, decided to create a new part number. Fred Forsell likes them, too, and as long as you follow good PS bypassing and don't ask them to drive a low impedance load, things go pretty well. Offset voltage is laser-trimmed to minimize the need for interstage coupling capacitors. Jan 30, 2004 · Looking to buy some opamps for rolling then stumbled on a thread with people saying that the three are the same thing. the OPA1612 oscillated like crazy, and the OPA2604 and Feb 1, 2006 · Actually, I've never had a OPA2604 oscillate, and I use the single version of it, the 604, as DC servos all the time. Jun 1, 2008 · 今回調べたなかでは、opa2604、opa2134、lm4562の周波数特性がいいですね。 2114はオーディオ用としては定評がありますが、あまり高周波での利用には向いていないようです。 358は一番周波数特性が悪いようですが、なんかゼロクロスに変な挙動が見えます。透明感がある。低域に適度な量感がありつつキレが良い。解像度も良く、音の速さを感じる。opa2604のクセが気になる人には、良いチョイスかも知れない。几帳面なほど正確であるが、面白味にはちょっと欠けるか。リファレンス向き。卓にも良い。 muses8820 International Airport Industrial Park • Mailing Address: PO Box 11400, Tucson, AZ 85734 • Street Address: 6730 S. You see the opa2604 has quite a thick sound, easy to listen to, not bright or analytical in any way and the LM4562 leans in the opposite direction, not too much mind but enough to liven up the opa2604 and put some sparkle in there while the opa2064 Nov 26, 2017 · thanks for your tips! i have tested the opa2604 and the LME49720 compared to the ne5532. 1 Absolute Maximum Ratings over operating free-air temperature range (unless otherwise noted) (1) 高音質電源改善アクセサリーを中心に、音響を中心に電気で世の中に貢献しています。 LM4562 LME49720 MUSES01 Burson Audio V5 Sparkoslabs SS3602 SIL 994 Enh Ticha Version 3 smd LM4562 LME49720 MUSES01 Sparkoslabs SS3602 SIL 994 Enh Ticha Measurements made with APX 525 with software APx500 V3. The LM4562 has higher 2nd harmonic (if that is what you wan´t) but higher 5th too. I've been researching and designing possible solutions around LM833 op-amps. The first one is sounding warm and innofensive, and the LM 4562 is cleaner and leaner. At least it lacks the unfavorable 7th which the OPA2604 has. This video title is; 2Which OpAmp is Better for 20W Class A Amplifier - OPA2604 vs NE553 OPA2604 provides wide dynamic range, even with high source impedance. It has a strong output stage as well as JFET inputs. com SNAS326K –AUGUST 2006–REVISED DECEMBER 2013 LM4562 Dual High-Performance, High-Fidelity Audio Operational Amplifier Check for Samples: LM4562 1FEATURES DESCRIPTION The LM4562 is part of the ultra May 15, 2022 · Buggle2 Riaa board. My favourite dual is OPA2604 and that's what I use in my CDP. (11MHz vs, 55 MHz)---thus much less chance of oscillation in vintage circuits. You have to try it yourself to hear the difference, because the measurement advantage is very small, so it should be non-audible , but it is not. Having LM4562 in both amplifiers and they start to sound the same. I note that the LM833 and LM4562 datasheets contain identical RIAA phono circuits in their application notes. It seems to miss a certain slam I had with the opa2132, might be because of the lower output current it can supply, 16 vs 40mA. LM4562 and LME49720 are the exact same part just different model stamped (stated by an ex-employee) The LME49860 is just a opa627, opa2604; lm4562(lme49720) lm6172, lm6171 【追試】dacのlpf（電源±9v）での試験【追試】lm4562 vs lm6172; まとめ. I'm still (perhaps irrationally) fond of the OPA604, maybe because some equipment I really like used it. Nov 16, 2008 · I use the OPA2604 ( OPA604 Single ) and find them the most musically pleasing to my ears. The LM4562 and LME49720 are IDENTICAL except for the ordering number and marking. Hi Guys, Could you tell us the differences between LM4562 and LME49720? The only difference I could see clearly is the price and the Vn( a difference of 0. Âm thanh của MUSES02 rất trong sáng, nền sạch, độ phân giải tốt, chi tiết phong phú, không có gờ nhiễu và trường âm rộng và sâu. Also comparisons of the OPA627 and OPA637 would be good. the ne5532 looks a bit harder, narrower and more direct, the other two a bit more relaxed and Jan 9, 2021 · Original file: https://www74. 4kHz bandwidth Here we see that the LM4562, LM833, LM49720 and OPA2134 all have the same level of performance with the NJM2742 having the worst performance of the bunch and the LT1352 being just slightly worse. The Sparko Labs dual opamp should work in it too. Aug 22, 2007 · Again the urban legend (fake news?) surfaces. . Because of (at least) the input stage differences (JFET vs. Regards, Felix. Search hi opa2604 is a fet and lm49860 is a bjt Aug 24, 2018 · THD+N Ratio vs Measured Level / Inverting 6dB Gain / 100k load / 22. chu moyヘッドホンアンプ製作のコツ（元記事です） cmoyヘッドホンアンプで検証するオペアンプの発振; 回路図. Correct me if I'm wrong. ® OPA2604 Distortion Rejection Circuitry* (3 The LM4562 A07 does work really well if you feed it with a good preamp like the Aiyima T6 Pro which also is flexible when it comes to op amps. May 19, 2017 · By most standards the LM4562 is a superior op-amp to the NE5532. How to choose between lm4562 vs ne5532. Aug 3, 2013 · JRC5532DD: Not too far from the LM4562, but it seemed a bit harsher at times and less natural sounding OP275: Seemed to accentuate the mid-range a bit more than was natural, so vocals seemed more in-your-face and a bit overbearing to me. but the difference between opa2604 and LME49720 is much smaller than the difference between these two compared to the original ne5532. 2). Dec 2, 2010 · I have a phono preamp based on the OPA2134 and wondered if the LM4562 could be used as a one for one replacement for the OPA2134. I tested a few in both units and the best combination to my ears at least is the opa2604 in the output stage of the T6 Pro and the LM4562 in the A07. Before that, it was as sharp and cold as a swiss knife. 7 nF//500 pF 47 nF//33 nF LM4562 www. btw, you can do a bypass V+ to V-, and add a bypass from either V+ or V- to ground. This is a visual "off the scope screen" comparison of four different op amps often used in audio circuits. When measuring DC offset you have to measure using the output ground as a ref point. 1 k : 3. Unlike OPA2604 it presents all frequency spectrums in a balanced manner, thus sounding more detailed than OPA2604. Feb 11, 2021 · According to the TI datasheets OPA1612 has less noise than OPA1656. Apr 7, 2007 · Originally Posted by balou /img/forum/go_quote. Sep 7, 2024 · G'day all, an interesting thread. dac2 dx top edition. 83 k : 100 : 150 : 22 nF//4. No integrated opamp will give you "tube sound". Dec 22, 2016 · LM4562 in my revox player took more than 100 hours to sound good. Dec 28, 2017 · ne5532，opa2604，lm4562 没有突出的频段，因为据说资料里的开环增益全频段基本都差不多，感觉和opa2604没差，下次换了稳压再 The LM4562 has a wide supply range of ±2. The OPA2604 is available in 8-pin plastic mini-DIP and SO-8 surface-mount packages, specified for the –25°C to +85°C temperature range. Why is that? Kindly enlighten us to give an idea for the deciding factor. It provides a wider bandwidth, lower noise, and higher slew rate compared to the NE5532. Feb 28, 2021 · The LM4562 datasheet indicates it has at least 12dB greater open loop gain than LM833 at all audio frequencies. Watch out for fakes if buying op-amps. There is sufficient buz about the LM4562 to at least check the possibility out. The LM4562 was introduced first. Posted by KanedaK (A) on December 22, 2016 at 16:38:35 . OPA2604 is one of the few op-amps having +24 -24 max supply voltage. The fastest slew rate a needle in a vinyl LP track can provide is in the region of 2-3 V/us, I seem to remember an old IEEE recommendation of 6 V/us as plenty for vinyl audio hi-fi use. Jan 7, 2023 · Regarding muses02, I do not find it sibilant. ru Jun 8, 2010 · Attached are spectra from an OPA2604 and a LM4562 I have tested in my DAT recorder (gain of 10 or so I believe). It is smooth to me with a dose of musicality. ti. That said, a few people consder the OPA637 an 'upgrade' from the AD8620. Nov 10, 2013 · I have tested OPA2604, LM48960, LM4562, OP275, NE5532 and a Burson V6 Vivid. gif Ok, no chip without drawbacks. I would say it depends on what circuit. 電源電圧8～9v IC opam âm thanh MUSES02 chính hãng ( có thể nâng cấp cho OPA2604 NE5532 LM4562 ) MUSES02 là một opam đôi - dual-op - cao cấp hàng đầu sản xuất bởi Công ty JRC tại Nhật Bản. Apr 2, 2023 · LM4562和OPA2604都是高性能运算放大器，具有很多相似的特点，但是也存在一些差异。电路结构： LM4562和OPA2604采用的电路结构不同。LM4562具有高开环增益、高输入阻抗、低偏置电流、低输入噪音等特点，其电路结构为德州仪器公司(DTI)独创的推拉式（Push-Pull）输出 Oct 10, 2020 · Aiyima a04 with LM4562 is more dynamic, goes deeper in the bass and sound clearer. Over this supply range the LM4562’s input circuitry maintains excellent common-mode and power supply rejection, as well as maintaining its low input bias current. com/user?u=12254451Mail Jun 16, 2021 · Part Number: LM4562 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LME49720. OPA2134 seems inoffensive and defined enough but it's got this flat, slightly recessed in the midrange presentation - not quite what I'd call "dull" but not bright, just a bit "hifi", it sounds like an entry-level Japanese solid-state amplifier, and there's not much openess by OP-amp by song Jump table ↓* VOCAL CLASSIC POPSMUSES03 0:42~ 1:42~ 2:43~ Jun 13, 2016 · ヘッドフォン部にはopa2604が使われていますが、vantamの時と少し印象が違います。 dr. 1200 each. Jan 7, 2021 · In the end it was a complimentary balance between the BB opa2604 and the LM4562 that won the day. 4 at 1KHz. Nov 19, 2015 · I'm no op-amp expert but I believe LM4562 and OPA2134 in your list are duals, NE5534 is a single I think and NE5532 is the dual. Both are musically better than ne5532, in my subjective opinion. An interesting Nov 25, 2015 · Ive compared the NE5532, NJM4556 and LM4562 so far. zippyshare. X-fi Prelude' comparison a few threads down and I basically concluded from that the AD8620 might be considered better than the default LM4562. Dec 28, 2017 · 特别是op275 lt1057 ad712 opa2604这几种运放，我就觉得不好用。 AD827的低音是好，不过下潜不行，高频有毛躁。我用过这么多的双运放，就只觉得金封的OPA2111KM是我听过最好的双运放了，声音很平衡，你听过OPA2111KM以后我敢说你就不会再想听其他的什么双运放了。 Feb 29, 2008 · I've read about the 'Sondigo vs. Apr 17, 2021 · I will show the difference between the OPA2604 vs the NE5532 OpAmp. Jan 1, 2019 · NE5532 vs OPA2604 -> the second is more musical, better voice Lm4562 also offer slightly better measurement results ( as pma has shown in Aiyima a07 ). LM4562-+ LM4562 10pF + + INPUT OUTPUT 47 k : 150 : 3320: 909 : 26. bipolar in the NE5532) there may some perceivable performance differences. Promo khusus pengguna baru di aplikasi Tokopedia! Website tokopedia memerlukan javascript untuk dapat ditampilkan. html0:00 In The Rain (Muses02)1:58 Silly (Muses02)3:31 lost in the dream (Muses02)4:02 忘れられない Jun 8, 2018 · The OPA2604 is FET input IIRC, so using a BJT part like the 5532 would necessitate checking impedances to make sure the resistor values around the opamps are suitable for using something other than a FET opamp. Feb 11, 2021 · Even AD797 or OP627 cant hold a candle vs OPA1612 in terms of SQ - the difference is HUGE! My preamp sounds best with OPA1612 for gain and OPA2192 as buffer. Dec 22, 2016 · OPA2134 vs OPA2604 vs OPA2107. It is difficult to say which one is better. 1 6/19 2016-07-13 ACAV Aug 1, 2024 · LM4562 max safe current. The sound is much better but there's still something a bit "hi-fi" and "grey" in the presentation. Tested a lot of OP, including LME49720, OPA1612, OPA1642, MUSES8920 and MUSES8820. LME49720 is significantly more expensive than LM4562. Apr 16, 2011 · Get it all working first and then I would suggest trying the OPA2604 and perhaps the LM4562. They are fairly tolerant of non-optimal circuits, at least in my experience. One can almost not find two more different sounding IC:s. com/v/xPj5IKtZ/file. OPA2604 is a little bit faster. But that does not say anything about the SQ. +Gain Bandwidth. Sep 1, 2023 · NE5532 vs OPA2604 The OPA2604 is a high-performance audio op-amp known for its exceptional sound quality and low distortion characteristics. Help! Приложение к сайту http://hifi-audio. Edited April 6, 2020 by muon* Oct 8, 2001 · TI/Burr Brown's OPA2604 is a good alternative as well. There are clearly sounddifferences between opa2604 and lm4562. And this preamp sounds MUCH better than Audio Research, Burmester and Accuphase preamps costing above €10. OPA2604 SBOS006A–SEPTEMBER 2000–REVISED DECEMBER 2015 www. patreon. MUSES8820 is the best, IMHO. Haven't tried the LM4562. However, be prepared to shell out anywhere from Rs. In audio, you may get by with a V+ to V- bypass, but if the goal is to stablize the supply while its output delivers current to ground, then the bypasses really should be to ground. Old op-amps such as the LF412 and TL072 are more than good enough for 99% of audio applications. The best solution is actuallly to bypass +V to ground, and -V to ground. THD+N vs Frequency V CC = 15V, V EE = –15V, V OUT =3V RMS R L = 10kΩ THD+N vs Frequency V CC = 12V, V EE = –12V, V OUT =3V RMS R L = 10kΩ 20157267 20157266 THD+N vs Frequency V CC = 17V, V EE = –17V, V OUT =3V RMS R L = 10kΩ IMD vs Output Voltage V CC = 15V, V EE = –15V R L =2kΩ 20157268 201572E6 IMD vs Output Voltage V CC = 12V, V Aug 26, 2018 · lm4562、lme49720：三频非常平衡，高频中规中矩，中频和低频都不错，声场不错，但久听感觉高频缺乏感染力，总体还是不错。推荐度：★★★☆ LME49860：三频非常平衡，高频通透，中频和低频中规中矩，声场不错，总体还是比较耐听，感觉比LM4562、LME49720好一些 Aug 22, 2007 · I always replace the NE5532 in a Rotel's phono circuit with a FET OPA2134 or OPA2604. Dec 6, 2018 · Just replace the original op-amp with one with a similar specification, if it's not possible to find an exact replacement. 5V to ±17V. Aug 28, 2023 · 2. With all that said, matching is key, so I wouldn't say one is superior to the other. 交換可能な5カ所全てのオペアンプをmuses8920に交換したモデルになります。通常のdxに比べると一音一音がクッキリでている感じです。 Apr 1, 2023 · 答：OPA2604的封装有两种，一种是标准双列直插封装（DIP），另一种是更小型的SOIC封装。在DIP封装的OPA2604芯片上，德州仪器曾经采用"Burr-Brown"标识并印刷了BB字母的图案（也就是BB字符的LOGO），这是因为它们曾经是以该品牌的名义进行销售的一个品牌系列。 Jan 7, 2021 · Noise is almost same as with LM4562 and there are no problems with distortion. That's a FET input op-amp though. This has been dispelled by people employed by NS and TI -- back then and currently. 400 - Rs. ••• Apr 6, 2020 · For dual op-amps I like OPA2604 as they are FET input and are valve like sounding in character with their very nice mid-range, but went further as someone gave me some Burson V5i hybrids which aren't quite as nice in the mids but are better over all. OPA2604 with Rl=1k1 and different output levels vs frequency NJM4558 with Rl=1k1 and different output levels vs frequency Audio Opamps, fact, myths and THD measurement resultsRev. Choosing between the LM4562 and NE5532 depends on your specific application requirements and priorities. strangely its probably the most boring sounding one when paired with 400i but the best sounding with hd600. Beli OPA2604 OPA2604AU OPA 2604AU OPA 2604 Dual Low Distortion Op-Amp BE70 di toko puwei. The opa2604 is a fet opamp and 4562 is a bipolar based IC. muses02 timbre is also natural and organic. I've replaced the old TL082 in my active crossover with opa2134. Patreon https://www. OPA2134 is more stable, as it is not too fast for Audio. I've used both LM4562 and OPA2604 from the suggestions. 000. #1 Choose the LM4562 (LM4562 vs NE5532): High-End Audio Quality: If your application demands the highest audio quality, low distortion, and minimal noise interference, the LM4562 is a better choice Dec 14, 2007 · At the high end, the NatSemi LME49710/49720/49740 (LM4562) family has impressive specs - and are generally the best for almost all applications except as a low-gain or unity-gain buffer. Nov 8, 2006 · OPA2134 and OPA2604 are very close in data. Noise of the A07 is mostly defined by high resistance values in its resistor network around the input dual opamp, there is no chance for improvement without re-designing. Tucson Blvd. Although I am a fan of the OPA2134, I still have very considerable respect for the NE5532. Headphones:Argon T-X0 (mk3 baffle), T60RP Argon, Vibrolab Mk3 Zebrawood & MK2 Walnut self built. I cannot confirm that the OPA2604 has Feb 25, 2007 · Bypassing from V+ to V- will be good. May 22, 2015 · G'day all, in the light of a recent experience where a DIY phono stage of mine using LM4562's went into destructive oscillation, I think that perhaps the like of the LM4562 are possibly 'too good' and touchy and I now feel more comfortable with the like of the OPA2134 and the NE5532 at least for high quality audio applications. 追記; 関連記事; 関連記事. I like the phono preamp (an Acoustech PH-1P) but couldn't help wondering if the LM4562 would make an improvement. Jan 3, 2023 · There are clearly sounddifferences between opa2604 and lm4562. OPA1612 sounds better than any transistor preamp I've ever heard and better then my own 6N6P 2 case -no barrels hold- 36kg monster preamp with a 100% double blind test win rate. If anything, it has a more 'neutral' sound than the (possibly slightly euphonic) OPA2134, but its performance is very reliable and dependable and of a very high standard, which possibly explains its long standing use in 'professional' audio gear. The LM4562 is unity gain stable. LM is the best overall, it sounds the most balanced, very natural/smooth/clean, doesnt exaggerate anything but can sound lacking in impact. OPA2604: The most polite, non-fatiguing, but also the least dynamic and exciting with the smallest soundstage. Some vendors market them as the same as well. the differences aren't huge, but big enough to make a change worthwhile. , Tucson, AZ 85706 • Tel: (520) 746-1111 • Twx: 910-952-1111 Jul 5, 2006 · Hi All, Can OPA2604 be directly swap with LM4562/LME49720HA/LME49860 in a DA output? thANKS. Arguing for faster opamps in a phono circuit is an overkill. fpiy ulys lmrbxfw medis dukh bhlbbns oadxvg yjm ibk lomru